HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson can't get a break these days. The guy floats an idea in the press that maybe FHA could create a new program to help upside-down borrowers -- by insuring 80 to 85 percent of a loan, instead of the full amount -- and the Bush administration acts like he's that embarrassing relative who gets loaded and jumps up on the bandstand at weddings.
Jackson told the Washington Times last week that he'd proposed the new loan guarantee program to the White House.
But a HUD spokesman now tells the Wall Street Journal that Jackson was "referring to one possible idea that has been out there for some time." HUD would not confirm Jackson's statements to the Washington Times -- even though he went to the paper and had a lengthy discussion with reporters and editors -- or that a proposal had been submitted to the White House.
The Journal says the plan was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget, but Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson also seemed eager to distance the administration from the idea, conceding vaguely that Jackson "is examining the potential for FHA to be a solution for these borrowers," the Journal reports.
Jackson may have been trying to keep Democrats from taking the lead on the issue -- Rep. Barney Frank has proposed legislation that would provide FHA with $300 billion in additional mortgage guarantees to refinance something on the order of 2 million upside down loans, with lenders recovering no more than 85 percent of a property's current value (see Inman News story).
The housing secretary's announcement to the Washington Times -- a conservative paper that can count on Bush administration officials like Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dropping by for exclusive interviews -- that HUD was considering a similar program was largely overshadowed by an off-the-cuff remark he made in the course of the interview.
"I'm an attorney, and I've had eight houses and I didn't read all that mess," Jackson said of the stack of paperwork involved with buying a home. "If I didn't read it — and I doubt anyone around this table read it — then we can't hold people responsible for not reading every line when they were closing their loan."
Jackson was trying to explain why HUD is proposing to simplify loan disclosures. But his admission that he doesn't read the fine print of his loan terms was widely disparaged by bloggers.
"Can you imagine your financial adviser saying something like that?" Bankrate.com's Holden Lewis wondered. "You'd find a replacement, pronto. But we're stuck with this housing secretary until January."
That's because the Bush administration, while it may not be backing Jackson's proposal to allow FHA to help upside down borrowers, is standing behind him as controversy over allegations of cronyism and favoritism have culminated in calls for his resignation.
There are four investigations into allegations that Jackson has, among other things, withheld funds from the Philadelphia Housing Authority after it wouldn't hand over $2 million in public property to a friend of Jackson's, and steered contracts to other friends through housing authorities in New Orleans and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
When Jackson refused to answer questions about those and other allegations at a Senate Banking Committee hearing on HUD's budget, Democratic Senators Chris Dodd and Patty Murray drafted a letter to President Bush demanding Jackson's resignation.
The administration is standing behind the housing secretary, but the Washington Post has now dubbed him "Stonewall Jackson" and the New York Times editorial board opines that he "is a little distracted right now."
Dodd and Murray were a little more dramatic in their letter to the President demanding Jackson's resignation.
"The nation is in the midst of a housing crisis and it is imperative that (HUD) be headed by a leader who can work tirelessly to find solutions to the problems plaguing the housing and mortgage markets," they wrote. "Unfortunately, the allegations surrounding Secretary Jackson, as well as his rejection of appropriate Congressional oversight of his Department, undermine his ability to effectively address the current housing crisis. During this critical period, the American people do not need a HUD Secretary that is distracted by the clouds of Justice Department investigations and reports of an empanelled grand jury."
Maybe now would be an opportune time to send Jackson back to China to hawk U.S. mortgage-backed securities?